Unfair Dismissal

Cases where the tribunal found the dismissal was unfair. What the employer did, what a reasonable employer would have done differently, and what it cost.

66 results
Employer-favourable 1978

Your employer must show the standard was genuinely unacceptable, not just imperfect.

Dismissal on capability grounds requires a genuine and reasonably held belief that the employee cannot perform to the required standard, based on proper investigation, not simply an incident or a disagreement about performance.

Mixed 1977

Whether your dismissal was fair is judged on what your employer knew at the time.

The fairness of a dismissal is assessed on what your employer knew at the time it was made, not on information that came to light afterwards.

Employee-favourable 2026

Your employer recognised you needed help, then did nothing for six months before dismissing you.

If your employer identifies that you need occupational health support or extra training and then does nothing about it for months, that failure can turn a later performance dismissal into unlawful disability discrimination.

Employer-favourable 2019

A thin occupational health report is weaker evidence than your employer wants it to be.

A thin, bare-conclusion occupational health report carries less weight than a detailed one, so if your employer’s decision rests on a weak OH assessment, you can ask what questions OH was actually asked and whether the report properly engages with your situation.

Employer-favourable 2021

Tribunals will only look behind a final written warning if it was clearly wrong.

A final written warning behind your dismissal is rarely reopened by a tribunal. The question is usually whether the dismissal itself was reasonable, not whether the warning was fair.

Employee-favourable 2017

Being on sick leave when you are dismissed does not make the dismissal automatically fair.

The employer must have genuinely engaged with the medical evidence and considered the full circumstances. Only then can a decision to dismiss be fair. Prolonged absence does not by itself justify dismissal for ill-health capability.

Employer-favourable 1977

When your employer is deciding whether to dismiss you for ill-health absence, your personal circumstances must be part of that decision.

An ill-health dismissal requires the employer to genuinely investigate the medical position and balance the employee’s personal circumstances, length of service, and the prognosis against the needs of the business.

Employer-favourable 1981

In unfair dismissal, the question is not whether you are innocent but whether your employer’s decision was within the range of responses a reasonable employer would take.

Unfair dismissal is not about whether you are guilty or innocent. It is about whether your employer’s decision and process fell within the range of what a reasonable employer would have done.

Mixed 2006

Your compensation can be reduced if you would have been dismissed anyway.

Even if a tribunal finds your dismissal was unfair, your compensation can be reduced, including to nil, if the tribunal concludes you would have been fairly dismissed anyway had the employer followed a proper process.

Mixed 2007

A tribunal must assess the chance of dismissal even when the answer is uncertain.

A tribunal must always make a genuine attempt to assess the Polkey reduction, using the available evidence, and cannot simply use uncertainty as a reason to wipe out compensation.

Employer-favourable 1983

A tribunal tests whether a reasonable employer could have made your employer’s decision.

In an unfair dismissal claim, the test is not what the tribunal would have decided but whether your employer’s decision was one a reasonable employer could have made. Process failures are often where employers fall outside the range.

Employee-favourable 1995

Your employer can be liable for psychiatric injury caused by overwork.

Your employer owes you a duty of care that covers psychiatric injury from overwork. Once it knows you are at risk, it must act.