Case Studies

Real employment tribunal decisions, explained in plain English for employees. Each case sets out what happened, what the tribunal found, and what it means for you.

234 case studies
Employer-favourable 2002

Your employer’s investigation has to be reasonable, not just their decision to dismiss.

An employer's investigation is judged by whether a reasonable employer would call it fair, so gaps in the investigation can matter as much as the decision itself.

Employer-favourable 2002

Tips used to count towards minimum wage. That changed in 2009.

This case reflects the law as it stood before 2009, when employers could lawfully use tips to top up pay to the minimum wage. That is no longer allowed.

Employee-favourable 2001

Discrimination that makes you ill can increase your compensation.

A psychiatric injury caused by discrimination, such as depression, can be compensated separately from injury to feelings, or as part of it, as long as the tribunal is clear about what it is awarding for.

Employee-favourable 2000

A leaving-notice deduction that ignores your employer’s real loss can be an unlawful penalty.

A clause deducting a fixed sum from your pay for not working full notice is an unlawful penalty, not a valid liquidated damages clause, if it doesn't limit what your employer can otherwise claim for its actual loss.

Employer-favourable 2000

If your employer’s investigation found no real evidence, that alone doesn’t make your dismissal unfair.

In an unfair dismissal claim, proving your innocence isn't the test. The test is whether your employer's investigation and belief in your guilt were ones a reasonable employer could have reached.

Employee-favourable 2000

Your employer can be liable if colleagues harass you after you report a serious incident.

Protecting you from foreseeable harm at the hands of colleagues is part of your employer's duty too, not only harm stemming from management decisions. If they know, or reasonably should know, that a complaint led to you being harassed or retaliated against, acting on it isn't optional.

Employee-favourable 2000

A harassment policy alone does not protect your employer from liability.

Protection from liability requires more than a harassment policy sitting on paper. An employer has to show it actively took all reasonable steps to prevent discrimination before it happened.

Mixed 1999

A redundancy has to be about the job, not the person doing it

A genuine redundancy is judged by what work has actually reduced, not by how widely your contract technically allows your employer to move you around.

Employee-favourable 1999

The 48-hour working week limit is not just guidance. It is an enforceable right.

The 48-hour average weekly working limit under the Working Time Regulations is an enforceable legal right, not guidance, and applies to you unless you have voluntarily signed a written opt-out.

Employee-favourable 1999

If your employer keeps failing to fix a problem, that failure can itself be a reason to leave.

If your employer fails to resolve a problem you have raised, and that failure continues, each day of inaction can add to the cumulative picture you rely on when you eventually resign.

Employee-favourable 1999

Your employer’s duty to risk-assess for pregnancy starts before you even announce it.

Your employer's duty to risk-assess for pregnancy-related risks starts the moment they have women of childbearing age on staff, not once you've told them you're pregnant.

Employee-favourable 1999

If a colleague makes you fear for your safety, leaving can be protected by law

You can be protected by law for leaving work because a colleague frightened you. The danger does not have to come from equipment or premises.