← Back to case studies
Case law
Simpson v Endsleigh Insurance Services Ltd

If you’re made redundant on maternity leave, your employer must actually offer you a suitable role, not just a chance to apply for one.

The ruling

“Regulation 10 requires a suitable alternative role during maternity leave to be offered outright, but the role still has to genuinely be suitable.”

If you're made redundant during maternity leave and a suitable role exists, your employer must offer it to you outright, not just invite you to apply.

  • If you are made redundant while on maternity leave and a suitable alternative role exists, your employer must offer it to you directly. Being invited to apply or interview alongside other candidates is not enough.
  • Whether a role counts as suitable looks at more than just the job description. Location, hours and other terms all matter, and a role that requires you to relocate a long way may not count as suitable.
  • If your employer skips this duty where a genuinely suitable role did exist, that can amount to automatic unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Read the full case

The situation

Ms Simpson, an insurance consultant, was on maternity leave when her employer began a redundancy consultation that involved closing several branches, including the one she worked at in London. She was sent details of alternative roles she could apply for, including a guaranteed post at a call centre in Cheltenham if she was willing to relocate. She did not apply, citing ongoing illness following childbirth, and was made redundant.

What the tribunal found

The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that regulation 10 of the Maternity and Parental Leave etc. Regulations 1999 requires an employer to offer an employee on maternity leave any suitable alternative vacancy outright; it is not enough to invite her to apply or attend an interview or assessment process for it. On the facts of this case, though, the tribunal found that the Cheltenham role was not a suitable alternative for Ms Simpson, because relocating from London was a substantially less favourable change, so the employer was not found to have breached its duty here.

Full citation

Simpson v Endsleigh Insurance Services Ltd. [2011] ICR 75. Employment Appeal Tribunal. 2010.

Last reviewed 5 July 2026